|
January
29, 2001
The
following article was
written by Fr Hugh Murray CM for the September 2000 issue of
'Oceania Vincentian' . ('Oceania Vincentian' is a Publication in
the Australian Province of the Vincentians):
******
Vincent
and the Oratory
Hugh
Murray CM
"absent
minded child"
Msgr.
Ronald Knox said, some four hundred years after the death of St
Philip Neri, that Philip "absent mindedly" founded the
community that was originally only a movement centred around
friendship with him. (1)
St
Philip Neri was born in Florence in 1515. He died on May 26,
1595, in his eightieth year, when Vincent de Paul was a boy of
fourteen. By the time Vincent was thirty, the one time farmer's
son had come under the influence of one of the great Oratorians
of France, de Bérulle. The Oratory itself, St Philip's
"absent minded child", had, by then, changed
remarkably from the single - house concept of the Founder to a
powerful and numerous congregation. The multi-housed group was
to wield much influence for the next couple of hundred years.
The Revolution was to cause its demise. It rose again in 1852,
metamorphosed and diminished as were Saint Sulpice, the Eudists
and the Vincentians. (2)
"...........he
was able to be confirmed in his Englishness"
But
in 1849, John Henry Newman, fresh convert that he was, founded
an Oratory in the suburb of Edgbaston in the English city of
Birmingham. He had spent a few months at the Chiesa Nuova, the
Roman Oratory, to learn the skills of Oratorian living,
returning refreshed in his religious self, but enmeshed in his
being English.
One
of the things that Newman loved about the Oratory was that he
was able to be confirmed in his Englishness. Brompton in London,
later became independent, not only because that is what an
Oratory did, but because it could not let Birmingham stay so
very English. The life of an Oratory is said to be built with
regard for "well known faces"(3). Newman was to say
that he liked an Oratory to have no more than a dozen priests.
However,
The Brompton Oratory looked "across the Alps" for
every hint of "How to be TRULY Roman Catholic". It is
interesting to note that there seems to have been little real
communication with the "heart" of the Church even
then. If we look at the Brompton of 2000 CE, perhaps the image
of Rome is really a mirage, an image warped in space as well as
time, both then and now.
Some
french influences
One
might well wonder why the emphasis in this article has been more
on Newman and Birmingham, and Faber and Brompton, rather than on
the Oratories of St Vincent's time. It might well be that
readers of English have only the English Oratories in mind when
we posit Vincent with the Oratories of France.
It
is remarkable, maybe because of Vincentian congregational
myopia, how we tend to think of St Vincent as so revolutionary
in the structure of the Company and ignore other structures in
France of the 17th century.
There
were communities other than the Oratorians without Religious
Vows. In 1643 Jean-Jaques Olier received approval for such a
community of priests for staffing seminaries. St John Eudes left
the Oratorians in 1643 and instituted the Congregation of Jesus
and Mary: diocesan priests without vows, running seminaries and
giving parish missions. Adrien Bourdoise, friend of both Vincent
and de Berulle, set up a group of priests in the Parish of St
Nicholas de Chardonnet (4).
It
may be that these men were following in the footsteps of Vincent
de Paul. After all, he had started his work as early as 1617
when he was working for the "real founders" of the
future Company. He was already well on the way to a conversion
and much of this may well be credited to his spiritual director,
Pierre de Bérulle. St Vincent was to say that "Cardinal de
Bérulle was one of the holiest man he knew." Since de Bérulle
did not become a Cardinal until 1627, and had died in 1629, it
would seem that Vincent's remark would have been made after 1629
when Vincent seems to have ceased being directed by Pierre de Bérulle
(5).
Vincent
de Paul and Pierre de Bérulle
It
seems that Vincent and de Bérulle first came to know each other
in 1608. Vincent had been a priest for eight years. His
association with the gentry was providing some good addresses
and some useful people. In 1610 the incident with the accusing
judge had taken place. Vincent seems already being changed from
the professional priest, full of ambition, to someone aware of,
and reacting to, basic goodness.
De
Bérulle put the final touches to the French Oratory on November
11, 1611. Vincent lived with them for a while but by May 2,
1612, he had gone to Clichy. (6) This period would have been the
first time that St Vincent would have lived in a community of
secular priests. Perhaps the ambience was already indicative of
de Bérulle becoming something of a prima donna.
The
Oratory in Naples and Rome
This
French house of the Oratory was modeled in some ways, more on
the house at Naples rather than that at Rome. Even in St
Philip's time, Naples had some innovations that could cause
trouble. One was the introduction of a Promise of Stability (not
a vow) and the other was with regard to the possession of
private means. Naples was having trouble because a number of
young men were interested but they were without the essential
that Philip Neri wanted: the ability to provide for oneself.
By
February 14, 1612, Rome and Naples had been sorted out by papal
Decree. After that date, all houses calling themselves
Congregation of the Oratory were to be on the Roman pattern of
One House = One Congregation. In the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries the number based on the Roman model reached 150. (7)
A
prominent factor in Roman Oratory style was the basic equality
of each member, priest or layman. For convenience they chose a
Provost (Local superior) who, in fact in ecclesiastical law was
a Major superior, but the running of the house etc was done by
agreement rather than decree.
However,
despite the Roman wishes, it was in France that a form of the
Oratory really flourished. Any Oratory can and maybe should,
take a distinctive tone. But the concept that Neri had, of
prayer and work organised at a local level, was to vanish with
the French model.
De
Bérulle may well have been a holy man but there are plenty of
indications that he was also an interfering man. Neri had not
wanted his men to run seminaries, nor to direct nuns. De Bérulle
became very involved with Carmelite Nuns, wanting them to add a
further vow of servitude to God. Both the Jesuits and the
Discalced Friars were annoyed with him as were many of the Nuns.
However,
there was no doubting his ability to inspire and attract. A year
after the Cardinal's death in 1629, there were sixty three
communities including thirteen colleges and four seminaries
staffed by 400 priests, not counting laybrothers and young men
in formation. In 1650 there were 480 priests. The French Oratory
peaked at 650 priests in 1714 after which a decline set in. (8)
".....the
wretched little one at the Bons Enfants"
It
is interesting to note how troubled Vincent was in the matter of
the CMs taking vows. This article is not the place to elaborate
on this matter. Suffice to say that the shrewd Vincent de Paul
would have known all the difficulties that the French Oratory
were having with stability and with the possession of property.
On one occasion Vincent quoted an Oratorian as saying: "The
Oratory is just a respectable lodging house." (9)
The antagonism Vincent received from Rome (including hostility
from the Roman Oratory) for the foundation and statutes of the
Company has to be seen in the light of a good number of the
Oratorians becoming Cardinals and consequently, having much
influence on what suited them.
Another
area of conflict would have been with centralising needs on the
part of Vincent. Vincent wanted his men to be mobile, indeed
universally so. Their mobility was best ensured then, as it may
well be today, by the Superior General being in control. The
French Oratories, with all their tendencies to be centrally
controlled by de Bérulle would have had Neri's wishes and
concepts known to them, if not near to them. Not only was
Vincent a Centralist as far as government was concerned, but the
bulk of his letters indicate a person who has to nose his way
into all kinds of affairs. This would seem to be contrary to a
more liberal spirit such as Neri had.
Gradually,
de Bérulle ceased to have an influence on Vincent de Paul. Bérulle
died some thirty years before St Vincent. His successor, Father
Condren, helped Vincent all he could but already there was a
growing animosity between the French Oratory and the
Congregation of the Mission. They were engaged in the same works
at the same time in history. Jealousy must surely have been at
the root of the matter. There was no open warfare but it is
interesting that, ten days before he died, Vincent was comparing
the four seminaries of Paris:
"In
Paris there are four houses that specialise in this work: the
Oratory, St Sulpice,, St Nicholas de Chardonnet and the wretched
little one at the Bons Enfants.
The
aim at St Sulpice is to subordinate everything to the spirit and
then to purify this; to free the people from earthly desires and
lead them onto higher aspirations and feelings. We notice that
all who have been there show these characteristics; some more
than others. I do not know whether they teach Scholastic
Theology there.
Those
at St Nicholas are not quite so lofty-minded and tend to work in
the Lord's vineyard by training men to labour at their priestly
functions. With this intention they keep first of all to the
practical application of their priestly training and, secondly,
they take on lowly tasks like sweeping, washing up, scrubbing
etc. They can do this because most of the students do not pay
anything and the arrangement works well.
"We
will leave the Oratorians out of it and not talk about
them……….. (10)"
Those
members of the Congregation of the Mission who speak of the many
ways we follow the pattern of the Jesuits, will be interested in
noting that although the Oratory may well have been the first
Community Vincent stayed in, it was to the Jesuits that he
turned. As the Company grew and it became obvious that the young
men would need special help in living community life, Vincent
sent Fr Jean de la Salle to live with the Jesuits for a few
months. (11)
"....
the course of History might well have changed if
..........."
This
essay has been an attempt to see the interaction of Vincent de
Paul with the Oratory not of St Philip Neri but of Jesus and
Mary Immaculate as managed by Pierre de Bérulle. The picture is
not always pleasant but that is to be expected. We are looking
at two strong men, both powerful, both holy, both men of their
times. Both seem to have accepted the strata of society not
recognising that kings and queens would lose their heads in more
ways than one. The time would come with scarcely a crowned head
left in Europe and that both men would wonder, as they might
from heaven, at new times, new ways of Church and State
undreamed of by either.
Hilaire
Belloc at school at the Birmingham Oratory, when Newman lived
there, saw Cardinal Newman as a joke. Jack, as the boys
called Newman, would sweep into a class room and make the boys
(ten year olds) recite some Virgil and then burst into tears at
its poignancy. Once a year Eminence would direct a Latin play,
usually Terence, with all the earthier jokes excised. Neri
before was a joker and a prankster constantly getting into
trouble for his irreverence and his eccentricity. (12)
Vincent
de Paul would never have seen Pierre de Bérulle as joke. Maybe
the course of History might well have changed if St Vincent's
friends had been Neri's sons in the Roman rather than the French
fashion.
----------------------------------------------------
1.
THE ORATORY, Traveling Light in Community, Halbert Weidner,C.O.,
The Oratory, 434 Charlotte Ave Rock Hill,S.C. 29731 USA.
2.
For a splendid article, glittering with endnotes, see The
Congregation of the Oratory by JOHN PATRICK DONNELLY SJ in DE
MOLEN (Ed) 1994 Religious Orders of the Catholic Reformation,
Fordham University Press, N.Y.
3.
An article by HALBERT WEIDNER CO ,Newman's Oratory Charism, in
the Review for Religious, in 1992 , says: "When Newman had
a chance to defend Roman Catholicism…..against Pusey, there
was also the possibility of distancing that same Catholicism
from the foreign enthusiasm of converts like Manning, Ward, and
Faber. Newman could declare: "I prefer English habits of
belief and devotion to foreign, from the same causes, and by the
same right, which justifies foreigners in preferring their own.
In following those of my people, I show less singularity, and
create less disturbance than if I made a flourish with what is
novel and exotic.""
4.
St Louise's son, Michael, was one of those aspiring to be
trained. See Roman, p190
5.
For the relationship with de Berulle from the beginning, see
ST.VINCENT DE PAUL, A Biography , Fr José Maria Román C.M.
translated by Sr Joyce Howard D.C., Melisende, London, 1999,
page 96 et al.
6.
Op.cit. p97
7.
See DONNELLY'S article, p198 et seq
8.
DONNELLY'S article, page 206 et seq. Gives an interesting
breakdown on figures like this. One of the problems they had was
that, BECAUSE there was no formal bonding by vow or promise,
many joined to become well educated and the Oratorian colleges
were in fact teachers colleges.
9.
ROMAN, op.cit. p328
10.
ROMAN, op.cit. p 375
11.
ROMAN, op.cit. p283. Was this the beginnings of the Rodrigez
Tradition?
12.
A N WILSON, Hilaire Belloc, Penguin 1986 , p17 et seq.
******************
|